You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Hi. Does anyone know perhaps a proof of the following fact without using any specific construction of a covering of effective descent given by a localic topos?
Statement. The functor given by , i.e., Yoneda and then restriction, is fully faithful.
Perhaps there's a tricky way using some property about models of geometric theories in locales...?
Some ideas:
You can decompose a topos into locale slices: for each object in the topos you can write for the localic reflection of (its opens correspond to the subobjects of ). There is a geometric morphism
for each . The pullback restricts a sheaf to the frame of subobjects of .
The family of the 's is jointly surjective: if there are two objects and in and for each then .
Now for two geometric morphisms you can similarly show that as soon as for all objects .
Ok, this doesn't seem to work... there is no geometric morphism in general the way I described it.