You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
I was looking at the string diagrams for monoidal functors and it occured to me that the left and right 'faces' of the coloring used to wrap the objects of the domain category could be considered strings in their own right, with the laws of the monoidal functor resembling the laws of an adjunction. This led to the following observation:
Let be a bicategory. Then an adjunction in induces a lax monoidal functor defined by
This satisfies the axioms of a lax monoidal functor. Moreover, I conjecture that every lax monoidal functor is of this form for some adjunction in a bicategory.
By duality, the same adjunction induces a colax monoidal functor . So every lax monoidal functor induces a colax monoidal functor going the other way?
Does anyone know if these results are in the literature or folklore or are immediate consequences of known stuff? Or am I doing something wrong?
That's interesting. It doesn't immediately ring a bell. But I'm sure it's not true that every lax monoidal functor induces a colax one going the other way, so that suggests that your conjecture is false...
Perhaps it might hold if your lax monoidal functor has a left adjoint (which is then automatically colax monoidal)?
Well one special property of lax monoidal functors of this form is that there exists a special object such that for all we have --- I don't think that is a general feature of lax monoidal functors.
Mm, indeed. Not even the right adjoint ones.
I think this paper --- "Collages of String Diagrams" by Dylan Braithwaite and Mario Román --- is relevant here, although confess that I haven't really engaged with it myself.
I'm not sure if there's a result that this follows from, but the known fact that monads can be transported across an adjunction follows from your observation. Any monad on 0 is a monoid in End(0), and since F is lax monoidal, gets sent to a monoid F0 in End(1) which is a monad on 1. Also, comonads get transported the other way since G is colax monoidal. This latter fact appears as Theorem 4.2 here.
Chad Nester said:
I think this paper --- "Collages of String Diagrams" by Dylan Braithwaite and Mario Román --- is relevant here, although confess that I haven't really engaged with it myself.
Yes, thanks, this is relevant.
New conjecture: Let be a monoidal category. Consider the category whose objects are bicategories equipped with a strict 2-functor (where is the delooping of ) and an adjunction , and whose morphisms are strict 2-functors preserving , as well as the unit and counit of the adjunction.
Every object of induces a (co)lax monoidal functor defined by , with the direction of the laxity determined by the direction of the adjunction.
Let be the initial object of , and let be the (co)lax monoidal functor induced by this object. Then is the free (co)lax monoidal functor out of , in the following sense: Given any (co)lax monoidal functor , there is a strict monoidal functor such that , and is unique up to unique isomorphism.