You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Is anyone aware of a join/slice construction for T-multicategories? That is, an operation such that
(for
Would be useful for a homotopy theory of virtual equipments. There are clear issues that arise when one attempts to do this, and I am trying to resolve them, but just wondering if anyone has done such a thing?
I’m pretty sure it can’t exist. Let be the inclusion of the plain multicategory representing objects into the terminal multicategory. Then in the 2-category of plain multicategories the comma object is , so if also then the right-hand side of your desired isomorphism is empty while the left-hand side is presumably a singleton.
Interesting counter, perhaps the "adjunction" above doesn't generalize directly from the case of simplicial sets, though I still think something that can be done.
Can you elaborate on and ?
I know is .
Is something like ?
is one object with just an identity morphism, so if I’m following your notation I would shift the left leg of the second span to .
I think it’s a Real Problem
Noah Chrein said:
Interesting counter, perhaps the "adjunction" above doesn't generalize directly from the case of simplicial sets, though I still think something that can be done.
I think there’s probably a real problem here, myself. Slicing for multicategories is weird. If you slice over a plain object (a multifunctor from ) the resulting multicategory has only unary morphisms, for instance. The existence of nontrivial subterminals, in other words, feels like a big difference from categories or from simplicial stuff.
I think this is probably just the issue, the slice, as a comma category in the 2-category of multicategories is probably just the wrong concept to capture over-category. 2-categories don't, apriori, "see" the multicategorical nature of their objects
I've been approaching it internally, trying to generalize a form of Day convolution