You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
On the nlab, they say this:
Screenshot-2023-08-03-at-3.29.21-PM.png
Is there a paper where the precise coherence conditions are described in the infinitary case? I would even like a bit more, I'm interested by -distributive symmetric monoidal categories.
There are no coherence conditions. In a monoidal category with infinite coproducts, we have canonical morphisms (and similarly for tensoring with a coproduct on the left) and we ask that these morphisms are all invertible.
Oh I see, so the coherences that I'm thinking of, such as the 24 diagrams in the definition of symmetric bimonoidal categories that are listed in "Coherence for distributivity" by Laplaza, are thus facts to deduce from the universal properties of coproducts + the fact that this canonical morphisms are isomorphisms, and not part of the definition. It makes sense, thanks.
It would still be useful to define the coherence conditions for an infinitary symmetric bimonoidal category ie. one with a functor and a structure of symmetric monoidal category on . And they should be verified, when is a coproduct, as a proposition.
But we will need the definition of monoidal category with a tensor product which takes a family indexed by any set in input first haha
I don't know examples of this other than when this infinite tensor product is given by product or coproduct, but maybe it exists...
Jean-Baptiste Vienney said:
But we will need the definition of monoidal category with a tensor product which takes a family indexed by any set in input first haha
There's a definition (both symmetric and nonsymmetric variants) in the paper Real sets of Janelidze and Street.
An alternative definition of infinitary symmetric monoidal category is in my paper Operads as double functors
(as sketched in the introduction); namely, as product preserving lax double functors
, from the double category of pullback squares in sets to the double category of spans in sets.
Infinitary commutative monoids arise as product preserving double functors
to the double category of squares in sets.