You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
I have a faithful forgetful functor and I'm trying to capture the idea that “a -object admits, essentially, at most one structure of -object”, so an isomorphism-robust version of injective-on-objects. The correct notion, in my case, seems to be that, in addition to being faithful, reflects and is full on isomorphisms, that is, any isomorphism is the image of a (necessarily unique) isomorphism .
I have the impression that this kind of forgetful functors is quite common: examples (if I'm not wrong) are the forgetful functor from monoids to semigroups, or the forgetful functor from (cartesian monoidal categories, strong symmetric monoidal functors) to (monoidal categories, strong monoidal functors)...
So I would imagine that the notion deserves a name, but I don't think I've seen it before. Is this familiar to anyone?
(I think my second example is probably just full, but the first should be fine, and I can think of a few more...)
Hi, this sounds morally related to this MO discussion, although the precise condition mentioned there is a little different.
This is not quite the same, but it is perhaps suitable for your purposes. A monad on a complete category is property-like if the forgetful functor is injective-on-objects, or equivalently if it is pseudomonic (i.e. faithful and full on isomorphisms). (This is Theorem 7.1 of Kelly–Lack's On property-like structures.)
This just lacks your isomorphism reflection condition.
Ah, but pseudomonicity implies isomorphism reflection. If is an isomorphism, then it lifts to some isomorphism , and implies by faithfulness, so was an iso to begin with.
So that's exactly what I was looking for. Thank you Nathanael!
Ah, of course! Perfect :)
(Thanks Tobias too -- that was relevant, but “creates isomorphisms” does seem to be subtly different, that is, it just requires that if there is an iso , there is some iso , but not necessarily ...)
Right, that's why I only said that it was "morally" related :smile: for a category theorist clearly your version is the more natural one.