You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
By a "fibered group" I mean a function where each fiber has been equipped with the structure of a group. For fixed base this is a group object in (and we can also understand it as a functor from the discrete category to ). There's an obvious notion of an action of a fibered group on a family (fiberwise). For fibered groups and families with a left action of on and a right action of on we can make sense of a -biaction on a span ; one way of defining this is to think of the right action as a left action of the fiberwise opposite group , then form the external product of fibered groups and understand this as left-acting on the external product of families , encode the span as a single structure map , then define a biaction on the span to be a left action of on the family which makes into a (fiberwise-)equivariant map. None of this really required that we work with groups instead of monoids.
The example that's motivating all of this is that if we have a (small, strict) category with object set and a fibered group then we can form a new category with object set equipped with an objectwise surjective equivalence of categories onto , essentially by replacing each object of with the contractible groupoid whose object set is (the "universal bundle" groupoid of the "classifying space" groupoid ). This construction can also be understood as base change of the monad in the double category of spans along the vertical arrow . If we let with the obvious left -action and with the obvious right -action then the span admits a -biaction.
I would like to understand what I've outlined here in a cleaner way. I don't know if my definition of a biaction of a fibered group on a span is at all right, and I don't see a good "formal" construction of the biaction on the span in my motivating case. The specific family of groups and category I've been considering are the symmetric groups and the simplex category. Does anyone see a cleaner formalism for what I've written here, or recognize the ideas at all? I'd really appreciate a better high level pov in the hopes that it would make it clearer how or why the fibered biaction on the base change category arises.
Sorry for the wall of text, I'm happy to clarify things
Note that a fibred group is a groupoid where the source and target maps coincide. Is the biaction of a fibred group the same thing as a profunctor from the groupoid to itself? Haven't checked, myself.
Pretty much, it ignores the stuff about spans but that's okay. On the other hand I'm not sure how to get that category C' in terms of profunctors. If we base change along the functor BG -> discrete(J) then we don't get the fattened up version of C but instead a copy of C with the trivial action
My C' category is a monad on EG in Prof, where EG is the disjoint union of the indiscrete groupoid on each fiber. In fact C' can be recovered as the base change of the map EG -> discrete(J) which is p on objects
Maybe I could look at EG -> discrete(J) as an internal groupoid in Cat and consider internal profunctors on it?