Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: theory: category theory

Topic: Fibered groups and their actions on categories


view this post on Zulip Brendan Murphy (Nov 01 2023 at 01:42):

By a "fibered group" I mean a function p:GJp : G \to J where each fiber f1(j)f^{-1}(j) has been equipped with the structure of a group. For fixed base JJ this is a group object in Set/J\mathsf{Set}/J (and we can also understand it as a functor from the discrete category JJ to Grp\mathsf{Grp}). There's an obvious notion of an action of a fibered group on a family f:XJf : X \to J (fiberwise). For fibered groups p:GJ,q:HJp : G \to J, q : H \to J' and families f:XJ,g:YJf : X \to J, g : Y \to J' with a left action of pp on ff and a right action of qq on gg we can make sense of a (p,q)(p, q)-biaction on a span XZYX \leftarrow Z \rightarrow Y; one way of defining this is to think of the right action as a left action of the fiberwise opposite group qop:HopJq^{\mathrm{op}} : H^{\mathrm{op}} \to J', then form the external product of fibered groups p×qop:G×HopJ×Jp \times q^{\mathrm{op}} : G \times H^{\mathrm{op}} \to J \times J' and understand this as left-acting on the external product of families f×g:X×YJ×Jf \times g : X \times Y \to J \times J', encode the span as a single structure map u:ZX×Yu : Z \to X \times Y, then define a biaction on the span to be a left action of p×qopp \times q^{\mathrm{op}} on the family (p×q)u(p\times q) \circ u which makes uu into a (fiberwise-)equivariant map. None of this really required that we work with groups instead of monoids.

The example that's motivating all of this is that if we have a (small, strict) category C\mathcal{C} with object set JJ and a fibered group p:GJp : G \to J then we can form a new category C\mathcal{C}' with object set GG equipped with an objectwise surjective equivalence of categories onto C\mathcal{C}, essentially by replacing each object jj of C\mathcal{C} with the contractible groupoid whose object set is p1(j)p^{-1}(j) (the "universal bundle" groupoid of the "classifying space" groupoid B(p1(j))B (p^{-1}(j))). This construction can also be understood as base change of the monad C\mathcal{C} in the double category of spans along the vertical arrow pp. If we let X=GX = G with the obvious left GG-action and Y=GY = G with the obvious right GG-action then the span XMor(C)YX \leftarrow \operatorname{Mor}(\mathcal{C}') \rightarrow Y admits a (G,G)(G, G)-biaction.

I would like to understand what I've outlined here in a cleaner way. I don't know if my definition of a biaction of a fibered group on a span is at all right, and I don't see a good "formal" construction of the biaction on the span in my motivating case. The specific family of groups and category I've been considering are the symmetric groups and the simplex category. Does anyone see a cleaner formalism for what I've written here, or recognize the ideas at all? I'd really appreciate a better high level pov in the hopes that it would make it clearer how or why the fibered biaction on the base change category arises.

Sorry for the wall of text, I'm happy to clarify things

view this post on Zulip David Michael Roberts (Nov 01 2023 at 04:51):

Note that a fibred group is a groupoid where the source and target maps coincide. Is the biaction of a fibred group the same thing as a profunctor from the groupoid to itself? Haven't checked, myself.

view this post on Zulip Brendan Murphy (Nov 01 2023 at 16:20):

Pretty much, it ignores the stuff about spans but that's okay. On the other hand I'm not sure how to get that category C' in terms of profunctors. If we base change along the functor BG -> discrete(J) then we don't get the fattened up version of C but instead a copy of C with the trivial action

view this post on Zulip Brendan Murphy (Nov 01 2023 at 16:22):

My C' category is a monad on EG in Prof, where EG is the disjoint union of the indiscrete groupoid on each fiber. In fact C' can be recovered as the base change of the map EG -> discrete(J) which is p on objects

view this post on Zulip Brendan Murphy (Nov 01 2023 at 18:38):

Maybe I could look at EG -> discrete(J) as an internal groupoid in Cat and consider internal profunctors on it?