You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Let be a monoidal category, and and be -categories. Is there a good notion of a lax -functor ? Thereafter, is there a good notion of the lax Gray tensor product for -categories, corepresenting pairs of lax -functors? Ultimately I'm looking toward the enriched -category world, where 2-categories are just categories enriched in categories, so this would recover the usual lax Gray tensor product.
Seems to me you need some sort of extra structure on for this--the first one that comes to mind being a 2-category.
If is presentably monoidal, then we can view as a -category, so maybe that's enough?
Well, what do you expect to happen for , say?
I think viewing as a -category only helps if you then have some other reason to be able to treat as basically Cat. For example, a directed interval object or something similar.
Or from another point of view, how do you expect to get out lax functors as opposed to oplax functors?
ah I see what you mean. I guess I have been thinking of as a 2-category secretly
I don't think there should be a notion of lax -functor unless is a 2-category or more. After all, lax preservation of composition of 1-morphisms demands something like 2-morphisms.
If has something like an interval object you could probably use that to define lax -functors. I say "something like" an interval object because there are various notions of interval object, and you'll need to choose one with the right properties to get the job done.