Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: theory: category theory

Topic: Enriched laxness and tensor products


view this post on Zulip Reuben Stern (they/them) (Jun 17 2020 at 12:29):

Let V\mathcal{V} be a monoidal category, and C\mathcal{C} and D\mathcal{D} be V\mathcal{V}-categories. Is there a good notion of a lax V\mathcal{V}-functor F:CDF: \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{D}? Thereafter, is there a good notion of the lax Gray tensor product for V\mathcal{V}-categories, corepresenting pairs of lax V\mathcal{V}-functors? Ultimately I'm looking toward the enriched (,1)(\infty, 1)-category world, where 2-categories are just categories enriched in categories, so this would recover the usual lax Gray tensor product.

view this post on Zulip Reid Barton (Jun 17 2020 at 14:17):

Seems to me you need some sort of extra structure on V\mathcal{V} for this--the first one that comes to mind being a 2-category.

view this post on Zulip Reuben Stern (they/them) (Jun 17 2020 at 14:28):

If V\mathcal{V} is presentably monoidal, then we can view V\mathcal{V} as a V\mathcal{V}-category, so maybe that's enough?

view this post on Zulip Reid Barton (Jun 17 2020 at 14:28):

Well, what do you expect to happen for V=Set\mathcal{V} = \mathrm{Set}, say?

view this post on Zulip Reid Barton (Jun 17 2020 at 14:29):

I think viewing V\mathcal{V} as a V\mathcal{V}-category only helps if you then have some other reason to be able to treat V\mathcal{V} as basically Cat. For example, a directed interval object or something similar.

view this post on Zulip Reid Barton (Jun 17 2020 at 15:31):

Or from another point of view, how do you expect to get out lax functors as opposed to oplax functors?

view this post on Zulip Reuben Stern (they/them) (Jun 17 2020 at 15:34):

ah I see what you mean. I guess I have been thinking of V\mathcal{V} as a 2-category secretly

view this post on Zulip John Baez (Jun 17 2020 at 19:36):

I don't think there should be a notion of lax V\mathcal{V}-functor unless V\mathcal{V} is a 2-category or more. After all, lax preservation of composition of 1-morphisms demands something like 2-morphisms.

view this post on Zulip John Baez (Jun 17 2020 at 19:39):

If V\mathcal{V} has something like an interval object you could probably use that to define lax V\mathcal{V}-functors. I say "something like" an interval object because there are various notions of interval object, and you'll need to choose one with the right properties to get the job done.