You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
I was working with the Day convolution of presheaves, specifically where my base category is the free monoid from a set X. I noticed that in addition to the Day convolution (forgive my type theoretic notation for coends/ends):
with unit
you can define a dual
with unit a
I was hoping this would provide a linearly distributive category structure, but I think it doesn't. It looks like a kind of "constructive negation" of the tensor but it didn't match anything from Shulman's affine constructive logic afaict.
Anyway is this a well known structure?
Is even associative?
The associativity of depends on the distributivity of over ...
Hm I thought it was but looking at it in more detail I think not? Is it possible it gives a (non-symmetric) polycategory that is not representable or is that ruled out too?
BTW I think your formulas should have and ?
So the explicit definition of the putative polycategory structure would I guess be that a morphism consists of, for each equation , a morphism ?
If the monoid is trivial, then this would be essentially trying to define a polycategory structure on with and as the product and coproduct. It's known that that doesn't work to make a linearly distributive category, even though in that case is associative. I'd have to look back at the argument to be positive that you can't get a nonrepresentable polycategory either, but it seems unlikely to me.
Somewhat related: Brent Yorgey's thesis has a nice leisurely exposition (sections 4.2 and 5.1 specifically) of what Day Convolution specializes to for different choices of the two monoidal structures involved. His work is also quite influenced by type theory, so it should be a comfortable read for @Max New .