Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: theory: category theory

Topic: Do we need a full enrichment for day convolution


view this post on Zulip Brendan Murphy (Mar 16 2024 at 19:17):

The fundmental example of day convolution in my mind is the tensor product of graded objects, where it looks very much like a convolution. And when I'm thinking about graded objects I'm often working in an additive context, so e.g. graded abelian groups. But grAb:=Fun(disc(Z),Ab)\operatorname{gr}\mathsf{Ab} := \operatorname{Fun}(\operatorname{disc}(\Z), \mathsf{Ab}) doesn't acquire a day convolution monoidal structure as written, because disc(Z)\operatorname{disc}(\Z) is an ordinary category and what I've written is an ordinary functor category, not an Ab\mathsf{Ab}-enriched one. This isn't really a problem because we can take the free Ab\mathsf{Ab}-enriched category on disc(Z)\operatorname{disc}(\Z). But is there a way to get a day convolution type monoidal structure without this step, e.g. instead using that Ab\mathsf{Ab} is tensored over Set\mathsf{Set}?

view this post on Zulip Brendan Murphy (Mar 16 2024 at 19:19):

Maybe the thing to do here is to note Fun(disc(Z),Ab)\operatorname{Fun}(\operatorname{disc}(\Z), \mathsf{Ab}) can be identified with the category of cocontinuous functors FunL(Psh(disc(Z)),Ab)\operatorname{Fun}^L(\operatorname{Psh}(\operatorname{disc}(\Z)), \mathsf{Ab})? And then observe this is an internal hom of presentable categories and do some magic to transport over the day convolution structure?

view this post on Zulip Brendan Murphy (Mar 16 2024 at 19:22):

It would be nicer if this were a tensor product of presentable categories, so we could view the monoidal structure as a "base change" from ordinary (monoidal) categories to Ab\mathsf{Ab}-enriched (monoidal) categories

view this post on Zulip Brendan Murphy (Mar 16 2024 at 19:30):

Ah wait, Fun(disc(Z),Set)op\operatorname{Fun}(\operatorname{disc}(\Z), \mathsf{Set})^{\mathrm{op}} is the free completion of disc(Z)\operatorname{disc}(\Z) so FunR(Fun(disc(Z),Set)op,Ab)\operatorname{Fun}^R(\operatorname{Fun}(\operatorname{disc}(\Z), \mathsf{Set})^{\mathrm{op}}, \mathsf{Ab}) can be identified with Fun(disc(Z),Ab)\operatorname{Fun}(\operatorname{disc}(\Z), \mathsf{Ab}). And it's also the tensor product Fun(disc(Z),Set)Ab\operatorname{Fun}(\operatorname{disc}(\Z), \mathsf{Set}) \otimes \mathsf{Ab}. Well I'm satisfied for now but I'd be happy to hear anyone else's thoughts about day convolution without an enrichment

view this post on Zulip Nathanael Arkor (Mar 17 2024 at 00:55):

If CC is a promonoidal category and DD is a multicategory, then the category of functors [C,D][C, D] between their underlying categories acquires a multicategory structure, which is monoidal when DD is representable and monoidally cocomplete. In particular, this captures Day's convolution structure, taking D=SetD = \mathrm{Set}. The reference for this is §2.8 of Pisani's Sequential multicategories.

view this post on Zulip Brendan Murphy (Mar 17 2024 at 00:56):

Oh cool! Thanks for the reference