Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: theory: category theory

Topic: Definition of streams


view this post on Zulip Madeleine Birchfield (Dec 24 2023 at 20:14):

On the nLab there is currently a number of discussions over whether the set of streams of a set AA is defined as the final coalgebra of the endofunctor XA×XX \mapsto A \times X or the endofunctor X1+A×XX \mapsto 1 + A \times X:

https://nforum.ncatlab.org/discussion/17554/list-of-notable-initial-algebras-and-terminal-coalgebras/#Item_0

https://nforum.ncatlab.org/discussion/17572/stream/#Item_0

view this post on Zulip Nathaniel Virgo (Dec 25 2023 at 08:05):

I'd say both deserve to be called "streams", but personally I'd assume XA×XX\mapsto A\times X unless you said otherwise. There's lots of work that uses that definition, e.g. Rutten's work on "stream calculus".

view this post on Zulip fosco (Dec 25 2023 at 11:14):

I'm far from being an expert, but now that I think about it, I have seen both definitions; usually I intend A×A\times-, but Jacobs' coalgebra book (iirc) uses instead 1+A×1+A\times-...

view this post on Zulip Matteo Capucci (he/him) (Dec 27 2023 at 14:05):

In Glasgow the first are called streams and the latter colists

view this post on Zulip Oscar Cunningham (Dec 28 2023 at 14:40):

Would it be right to say that costreams are well defined, but that there aren't any?

view this post on Zulip Morgan Rogers (he/him) (Dec 29 2023 at 09:20):

@Oscar Cunningham what would be your intuitive definition of costream and why do you expect there not to be any?