You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
On the nLab there is currently a number of discussions over whether the set of streams of a set is defined as the final coalgebra of the endofunctor or the endofunctor :
https://nforum.ncatlab.org/discussion/17572/stream/#Item_0
I'd say both deserve to be called "streams", but personally I'd assume unless you said otherwise. There's lots of work that uses that definition, e.g. Rutten's work on "stream calculus".
I'm far from being an expert, but now that I think about it, I have seen both definitions; usually I intend , but Jacobs' coalgebra book (iirc) uses instead ...
In Glasgow the first are called streams and the latter colists
Would it be right to say that costreams are well defined, but that there aren't any?
@Oscar Cunningham what would be your intuitive definition of costream and why do you expect there not to be any?