Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: theory: category theory

Topic: Characterizing abelianness like stability


view this post on Zulip Brendan Murphy (Mar 29 2024 at 02:55):

In Characterizations of Abstract Stable Homotopy Theory by Moritz and Shulman they give the following equivalent conditions for a derivator (eg an infinity category) to be stable be7b0de7-bb91-4ef6-9955-c01872866648.png
The particular thing I'm interested in here is condition (iii), that stability is equivalent to finite limits and colimits commuting. Is there a similar characterization of abelian categories?

view this post on Zulip Eigil Rischel (Apr 12 2024 at 13:13):

Abelian categories have finite limits and colimits. The condition of having biproducts - that the products and coproducts coincide, which is called either additivity or preadditivity, depending on the source - is equivalent to the condition that products commute with colimits and coproducts commute with limits.

The further condition of being abelian is that every monomorphism is the kernel of its cokernel, and dually every epimorphism is the cokernel of its kernel. This amounts to a certain compatibility between pushouts and pullbacks - that in a square of this form:

image.png

if ABA \to B is a monomorphism and the square is a pushout, then it's a pullback, and dually if BCB \to C is an epimorphism, it's a pushout if it's a pullback. This is also some sort of compatibility condition between finite limits and colimits (if it was true for all squares that they were pushouts if and only if pullbacks, then finite limits and colimits would commute), but it's obviously a bit more complicated than the \infty-categorical case.