You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
We are used to consider monoidal categories, i.e. that are internal pseudomonoids .
But what about considering categories endowed with a bifunctor , where no tensor is required, and maybe enjoys some properties? Has anyone done this?
They're called closed categories.
Ah, nice! I called closed categories those that also had a monoidal structure, which is moreover closed
Those are usually called "closed monoidal categories" (or perhaps "monoidal closed categories" since one can take either the monoidal or the closed structure as basic and characterize the other in terms of it by a universal property).
Note that the traditional definition of "closed category" has a unit object in addition to a bifunctor , but there is a more recent variant called "prounital closed category" that has only .