Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: theory: category theory

Topic: Categories with hom but no tensor


view this post on Zulip fosco (Jun 30 2020 at 09:10):

We are used to consider monoidal categories, i.e. C\mathcal C that are internal pseudomonoids :C×CC\otimes : \mathcal C \times \mathcal C \to \mathcal C .

But what about considering categories endowed with a bifunctor [,]:Cop×CC [-,-] : \mathcal C^\text{op}\times \mathcal C \to \mathcal C , where no tensor is required, and maybe [,][-,-] enjoys some properties? Has anyone done this?

view this post on Zulip Paolo Capriotti (Jun 30 2020 at 09:13):

They're called closed categories.

view this post on Zulip fosco (Jun 30 2020 at 09:24):

Ah, nice! I called closed categories those that also had a monoidal structure, which is moreover closed

view this post on Zulip Mike Shulman (Jul 01 2020 at 16:07):

Those are usually called "closed monoidal categories" (or perhaps "monoidal closed categories" since one can take either the monoidal or the closed structure as basic and characterize the other in terms of it by a universal property).

view this post on Zulip Mike Shulman (Jul 01 2020 at 16:08):

Note that the traditional definition of "closed category" has a unit object II in addition to a bifunctor [,][-,-], but there is a more recent variant called "prounital closed category" that has only [,][-,-].