You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
This seems to pass a basic smell test (for dense, the colimit of is the same as the colimit of ), but it seems it's not always true.
Let be the inclusion of the non-coapex objects in the walking cospan. This is dense as is easily checked (3 cases, 2 of which are the same). However, it is clearly not final, as the colimit of a restricted functor is the coproduct of the 2 non-coapicial values, and the colimit of the unrestricted functor is the value at the coapex.
The domain of is discrete (in case you're defining it as ), and a functor with discrete domain is final if and only if it's a right adjoint.
...and I think one can just do case analysis to disprove the fact that has a left adjoint.
(is there a quicker way than just arguing that can't be of the form , whatever value has on objects?)
But in this case, the characterisation by connectedness of comma cats seems to readily apply, no? The comma (where denotes the apex) is empty, hence not connected.