You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Let be topological spaces.
Let be a continuous function.
Let denote the topology of , regarded as a poset category.
Write for the functor which sends the open set to the inclusion . Then the nerve-realization adjunction induced by between and restricts to the familiar adjunction between and which is usually written as the composition of the equivalance and an unrelated adjunction .
I realized this recently and found it interesting. I just wanted to share this.
I have written up a proof here in some personal notes.
https://github.com/patrick-nicodemus/research/blob/main/geometry/manifolds.typ, line 192
An important theorem here, somehow enabling this nice correspondence seems to be that the pullback functor is cocontinuous. As a result, it preserves pointwise left Kan extensions; so the usual functor (whose associated "realization" is the etale space functor for sheaves on Y) can be composed with the pullback functor to give a realization from sheaves on Y to etale spaces on X. (It is interesting that the pullback functor sends etale spaces to etale spaces.)
A particular case gives you (admittedly, with a certain amount of work)
Patrick Nicodemus said:
the equivalence
just choose !
Yes, this is something I maybe should have made more explicit: part of what makes this interesting to me is that it generalizes this nerve realization adjunction which is pretty well known.
This is highly unrelated and directed to French native speakers.
I remember have been scolded by algebraic geometers in my alma mater because it's not supposed to be an "etale space" but an "*étalé space", accent on both e, and it makes a difference (also: étale cohomology, accent only on the first e). Is it correct? :smile:
I'm not a native French speaker but I can confirm: étalé space, étale cohomology.
I remember a conversation about this some time ago on this Zulip. The general consensus, if I am not mistaken, seemed to be "write it and pronounce it however you want" (unless you're writing/speaking French, in which case you are obviously going to stick to the correct spelling and pronounciation). I don't think French native speakers would disagree with this, but maybe I don't know enough algebraic geometers! :smile:
The nLab says this:
Grammar and spelling
In French, the verb 'étaler' means, roughly, to spread out; '-er' becomes '-é' to make a past participle. So an 'espace étalé' is a space that has been spread out over . On the other hand, 'étale' is a (relatively obscure, distantly related) nautical adjective that can be translated as 'calm' or 'slack'.
To quote from the Wiktionnaire français:
'étale' _qualifie la mer qui ne monte ni ne descend à la fin du flot ou du jusant_
('flot' = 'flow' and 'jusant' = 'ebb').Pronunciation
The French pronunciation of "étalé" is three syllables; that of "étale" is two syllables, with the final "e" silent. Many English-speaking mathematicians follow the respective French pronunciations; see for example this nForum thread.
Others use the two-syllable pronunciation (corresponding to French "étale") for both written forms "étale" and "étalé". This group included [[Grothendieck]] himself, when speaking English. (See Colin McLarty, from 4:45 to 6:05 and particularly at 5:26.)
I write "etale", since as an American my job is to simplify things.
ah, it wasn't a dream that there was something on an nLab page then