Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: theory: category theory

Topic: ✔ pullback stability of adjunctions


view this post on Zulip Jonathan Beardsley (Jul 14 2023 at 22:14):

Suppose I've got an adjunction between categories C and D over a third category as below (the whole thing commutes). If I pick an object e∈E via a functor e:∗→E and pullback the whole thing along e, do I get another adjunction?
image.png

view this post on Zulip Jonathan Beardsley (Jul 14 2023 at 22:31):

oh i just found this answer https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1735771/is-the-pullback-of-an-adjunction-along-any-functor-an-adjunction from @Kevin Arlin

view this post on Zulip Jonathan Beardsley (Jul 14 2023 at 22:32):

I happen to be working with ∞-categories..... so does that help with the homotopical problems??

view this post on Zulip Mike Shulman (Jul 14 2023 at 22:33):

If the whole adjunction lies in the slice 2-category Cat/E{\rm Cat}/\mathcal{E}, which means that both functors make triangles commute and the unit and counit lie over the identity, then it's true because pullback is a 2-functor Cat/ECat{\rm Cat}/\mathcal{E} \to \rm Cat and hence preserves adjunctions.

view this post on Zulip Mike Shulman (Jul 14 2023 at 22:34):

If I read it correctly, the MSE question is only assuming that one of the functors lies in Cat/E{\rm Cat}/\mathcal{E}.

view this post on Zulip Jonathan Beardsley (Jul 14 2023 at 22:34):

Oh I see.

view this post on Zulip Jonathan Beardsley (Jul 14 2023 at 22:34):

Okay nice... I think I need to check on the (co)unit condition

view this post on Zulip Jonathan Beardsley (Jul 14 2023 at 22:36):

okay so my unit is the identity, so that's nice, haha.

view this post on Zulip Jonathan Beardsley (Jul 14 2023 at 22:37):

ok yesssssss it all works

view this post on Zulip Jonathan Beardsley (Jul 14 2023 at 22:38):

:pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray:

view this post on Zulip Jonathan Beardsley (Jul 14 2023 at 22:38):

that's nice though, i bet i can assemble that really precisely for ∞-categories from Riehl-Verity

view this post on Zulip Kevin Arlin (Jul 14 2023 at 23:04):

Yeah, you'd say something like "pullback is a cosmological functor between slice cosmoi so gives a 2-functor on homotopy 2-categories." The only little thing is that slice cosmoi's objects are isofibrations, not all functors, but that's rarely a problem since every functor is equivalent to an isofibration.

view this post on Zulip Jonathan Beardsley (Jul 14 2023 at 23:04):

ah crap but now i'm guess i'm stuck in a situation where i've got an adjunction in CatCat_\infty and i want to "lift" it to an adjunction in the slice

view this post on Zulip Jonathan Beardsley (Jul 14 2023 at 23:04):

wait how did Mike do latex

view this post on Zulip Jonathan Beardsley (Jul 14 2023 at 23:05):

likethis?like this?

view this post on Zulip Kevin Arlin (Jul 14 2023 at 23:05):

double dollar signs, yeah :(

view this post on Zulip Jonathan Beardsley (Jul 14 2023 at 23:10):

so in my case i'm looking at a really silly adjunction. I've got the diagram category D=abcD=a\to b\to c and the subcategory I=abI=a\to b, and so I'm left Kan extending along IDI\subset D and then precomposing back again. Now I want to fix the image of bb. And it's sort of obvious that the functors R ⁣:CDCIR\colon C^{D}\to C^{I} and Lan ⁣:CICDLan\colon C^{I}\to C^{D} both admit a map "evaluation at bb" down to CC. So fix some zCz\in C and pullback along that. That should give me another adjunction between the two categories but with one vertex fixed at a chosen object, right?

view this post on Zulip Jonathan Beardsley (Jul 14 2023 at 23:11):

but the difficulty, it seems, in the ∞-categorical setting, is getting that original adjunction (in CatCat_\infty) to lift to an adjunction in Cat/CCat_\infty/C.

view this post on Zulip Jonathan Beardsley (Jul 14 2023 at 23:15):

But maybe I can reduce the amount of "checking" I need to do by working in the homotopy 2-category or something?

view this post on Zulip Jonathan Beardsley (Jul 14 2023 at 23:29):

okay okay maybe this isn't so hard actually

view this post on Zulip Jonathan Beardsley (Jul 14 2023 at 23:29):

haha

view this post on Zulip Jonathan Beardsley (Jul 17 2023 at 19:58):

For the record I think the proof in the ∞-categorical setup (specifically Riehl-Verity) looks something like this:
image.png

view this post on Zulip Jonathan Beardsley (Jul 17 2023 at 19:59):

oops that has an arrow backwards

view this post on Zulip Notification Bot (Jul 17 2023 at 20:00):

Jonathan Beardsley has marked this topic as resolved.

view this post on Zulip Ralph Sarkis (Aug 03 2023 at 10:53):

I am not a moderator @Morgan Rogers (he/him) .