You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
I'm looking for a reference in which the axioms of a traced monoidal category are explicitly written down, including the associators and unitors. For example one usually encounters:
but this is not technically correct, instead I guess we should have:
While it is not terribly difficult to insert the necessary associators and unitors in the rest of the axioms, I am hoping that an explicit version exists somewhere in the literature. I can't find it!
Chad Nester said:
I'm looking for a reference in which the axioms of a traced monoidal category are explicitly written down, including the associators and unitors. For example one usually encounters:
but this is not technically correct, instead I guess we should have:
While it is not terribly difficult to insert the necessary associators and unitors in the rest of the axioms, I am hoping that an explicit version exists somewhere in the literature. I can't find it!
I think they are contained explicitly in this paper:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2109.00589.pdf
It looks like they are correct in this paper too (section 2): Traced Monads and Hopf Monads
Oh sorry, but there is only the definition of a traced symmetric monoidal category (definition 2.2).
Cole Comfort said:
Chad Nester said:
I'm looking for a reference in which the axioms of a traced monoidal category are explicitly written down, including the associators and unitors. For example one usually encounters:
but this is not technically correct, instead I guess we should have:
While it is not terribly difficult to insert the necessary associators and unitors in the rest of the axioms, I am hoping that an explicit version exists somewhere in the literature. I can't find it!
I think they are contained explicitly in this paper:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2109.00589.pdf
This has the unitors, but not the associators!
Jean-Baptiste Vienney said:
It looks like they are correct in this paper too (section 2): Traced Monads and Hopf Monads
This is perfect! Thanks.
Jean-Baptiste Vienney said:
Oh sorry, but there is only the definition of a traced symmetric monoidal category (definition 2.2).
That's actually what I'm looking for :)
Chad Nester has marked this topic as resolved.