You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
I am writing a paper in which I am the first author. I would like to make a personal dedication. Is it not an acceptable practice?
Usually at the end of the paper you can put an "acknowledgements" section where you can write stuff like "The first author wants to thank..."
This is used especially to acknowledge that the paper is part of some grant/project, but you can also use it to thanks whatever/whoever you want. I have very rarely seen proper dedications in a paper. Usually they are common in theses or books. Also, something like "the first author wants to dedicate the paper to..." sounds really strange. It sounds like you are deciding things by yourself without acknowledging your collaborators
A dedication should be concerted. Sometimes you can find it in the form of "this paper is dedicated to the memory of..." when someone in the community dies.
All things considered, if in a paper you want to acknowledge someone that is really special to you but not to the other authors or to the community, I'd go with a mention in the acknowledgements.
I don't think "the first author wants to dedicate the paper to" sounds weird on its own. I agree it is unusual to dedicate an ordinary research paper, but I've certainly seen individual dedications by one of the authors on a multi-author paper and I didn't think it weird.
I was thinking about more or less going along with @Mike Shulman's suggestion. I guess, so long as it is not getting in the way of the academic content of the paper, the editors are less likely to bother about it.
I have trouble imagining anyone objecting to it.
See, e.g., https://arxiv.org/pdf/1909.00297.pdf for one solution.
As far as I know the paper will be published as it appears on arXiv
Sometimes people note things near to "On the occasion of X's Nth birthday".
I have a paper with an in-memoriam dedication to a someone I knew who died early while I was preparing it.
If you say "the first author wishes to dedicate the paper to X", it makes me wonder slightly why the other authors didn't want to. If you can get your coauthors to go along, you can say "We wish to dedicate the paper to X", and eliminate this slight cloud of doubt.
Because it is a personal dedication, to be more precise, I would like this paper to dedicate to someone who is my family member, which is not that important to them, in the same way he is to me.
Ian Coley said:
As far as I know the paper will be published as it appears on arXiv
It has been already published (cf. here).
সায়ন্তন রায় said:
Because it is a personal dedication, to be more precise, I would like this paper to dedicate to someone who is my family member, which is not that important to them, in the same way he is to me.
Oh. That's the sort of dedication most people would do in a sole-authored paper or book, not a jointly authored one. But I guess it's okay.
সায়ন্তন রায় said:
Because it is a personal dedication, to be more precise, I would like this paper to dedicate to someone who is my family member, which is not that important to them, in the same way he is to me.
I did this once in multi-author paper by attaching a footnote to my name in the header - following the usual acknowledgement to funding agency.
That's the initial suggestion I got, but somehow I am not ok with writing dedication at the footnote. It is not that I am against it, but I guess it is more of a personal taste.
I have had coauthors including personal dedications here and here, if you want more samples.