You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
John Baez (Mar 13 2026 at 21:12):After decades of productive partnership with Cornell University, and with support from the Simons Foundation, arXiv is establishing itself as an independent nonprofit organization, marking the next stage in its 35-year history as a pioneer of open-access science. This exciting transition will allow for faster technological development, greater organizational flexibility, expanded partnerships, and long-term financial sustainability. Independence enables arXiv to keep up with all elements of its evolution; modernize its infrastructure, expand subject coverage, and engage more deeply with international stakeholders. This next chapter will ensure that arXiv continues serving tens of thousands of researchers worldwide with the same dedication to free and open scientific discovery that has so far earned it the prominence and respect of this exacting community.
arXiv’s current annual budget is approximately $6 million and its community-based funding model includes revenue from multiple sources such as foundations, membership program and fees from universities, libraries, laboratories, and research institutes, contributions from affiliates & partners such as professional societies, government agencies, and nonprofits, sponsorship from organizations and companies benefiting from arXiv’s services provide financial or in-kind, and individual & foundation gifts.
arXiv currently employs approximately 27 staff members, most of whom work remotely, primarily in the U.S.
THE LEADERSHIP OPPORTUNITY
Reporting directly to an inaugural board of directors, the chief executive officer (CEO) will be responsible for all aspects of arXiv, including strategic planning, financial management, technical infrastructure, personnel oversight and stakeholder engagement. The CEO will create, inspire, and lead an outstanding arXiv team and dozens of volunteer scientists. Additional responsibilities include establishing the strategic vision and direction setting, philanthropic development, cultivating alliances and partnerships, and representing arXiv in the community and media. Importantly, the CEO will work closely with board member representatives of Cornell University and the Simons Foundation to establish the organization’s independence and will lead its next phase of modernization, accessibility and strategic growth.
IDEAL EXPERIENCE
Qualified candidates will possess many of the following attributes, characteristics and experience:
- Progressively responsible executive leadership experience in an academic or nonprofit institution or related fields, such as online publishing and academic libraries.
- Strong operational and financial management of complex nonprofit organizations with a proven track record of leading, developing, and motivating high-performing teams who are experts in their fields. Experience with organizations reliant on volunteers is additive.
- Academic eminence, ideally in one of the major fields represented by arXiv, including Mathematics, Physics, and Computer Science; a demonstrated commitment to and experience advocating for open science is a plus.
- A track record of successful fundraising or other revenue generation; cultivating and stewarding major donors, such as individuals, foundations, and private institutions.
- A track record of successful partnership development, with experience in establishing trust and cultivating beneficial relationships with multiple stakeholders, with skill in facilitating discussions and inspiring effective decision-making within academic communities.
THE SEARCH PROCESS
Spencer Stuart, a global executive search and leadership advisory firm, has been retained by arXiv to help identify and recruit the next CEO. For confidential nominations and expressions of interest, please contact Spencer Stuart at arXivCEO@SpencerStuart.com.
The salary range for this position is expected to be within the range of $300,000; the actual salary offered may vary based on job-related knowledge, skills, and experience.
Kevin Carlson (Mar 13 2026 at 21:39):I think it seems good for such a critical piece of infrastructure to get its own standalone administration, though I'm a bit anxious to see whether the incentives of the new CEO and we users will be aligned.
John Baez (Mar 13 2026 at 21:44):That's the big problem, and that problem will never go away: at any moment, this CEO or some later CEO could decide to do something drastically at odds with the arXiv's mission. (Can they sell the arXiv to Elsevier? I hope this is against some rules.)
It's possible this is happening because the arXiv is scared Mr. You-Know-Who will crack down on Cornell University and thus the arXiv. I don't know.
Evan Patterson (Mar 13 2026 at 21:56):I'll offer another perspective: while I have great respect for what arXiv has done for the mathematical community, I've long felt that it's in need of new energy and fresh ideas. The technical infrastructure seems really ossified. And even before the deluge of LLM submissions, arXiv moderation has struggled to scale with the growth of the platform, is very opaque, and provides no means of redress. (Don't like how your paper got re-classified by the mods? Good luck fixing it!) So while there are of course risks to bringing in new leadership, I'm being cautiously optimistic at this point.
Kevin Carlson (Mar 13 2026 at 22:08):Well, generally a CEO is answerable to a board, who in a nonprofit is, I believe, legally obligated to stop the CEO from blowing up the mission. I don't think Brendan could sell Topos to OpenAI on his own initiative, for instance.
Ryan Wisnesky (Mar 13 2026 at 22:33):and for a private company, shareholders still have to approve certain things, like selling the company outright (a hostile takeover being when the CEO/board doesn't approve but the shareholders do)
Graham Manuell (Mar 14 2026 at 08:28):OpenAI is not something I would bring up when arguing that a CEO is answerable to the board...
Morgan Rogers (he/him) (Mar 14 2026 at 22:51):The CEO will create, inspire and lead... dozens of volunteer scientists.
Parenthood is a heavy responsibility indeed.
More seriously, I wouldn't mind being reminded what backups of the arXiv exist, if any...
John Baez (Mar 14 2026 at 22:58):I guess you know that the arXiv-run "mirrors" in other countries were taken down. The Dark Archive is an interesting European backup which, however, is currently not publicly available - hence its name. The idea, I guess, is that it would be made publicly visible iff some problem took down the original arXiv.
The big problem with many backup efforts is that most people putting their papers on the arXiv choose the copyright form that only gives the arXiv the right to their material. Of course this wouldn't deter illegal archives like Anna's Archive or LibGen. But the Dark Archive is worrying about it:
As a first step in building a Dark Archive, the rights clearance needs to be addressed, of course. Here, TIB had already commissioned a legal advisory survey back in 2016, in the context of a possible cooperation with arXiv.org. This included studying the licences used by arXiv, which broadly fall into the categories “arXiv.org licence” , “Creative Commons“, and “Public Domain“.
While nothing stands in the way of archiving the data and metadata as such, the status of these rights would have to be explored in detail if they were to be made accessible in the context of a public-facing service. This is especially relevant for resources under arXiv licences, since this licence type over the course of the years underwent several versions. Between the years 1991 and 2003, users were even able to upload data objects without explicitly stating a licence.
But before a user service can be even set up, the data need to be ingested into the TIB infrastructure. Here, arXiv itself offers several methods for full texts. Since both PDF and (La)TeX sources ought to be part of the TIB Dark Archive, we have opted for the download via Amazon S3. This is a possibility arXiv offers as a “requester pays buckets” method – meaning that TIB as the fetching entity covers the expenses arising with Amazon Web Services (AWS) https://info.arxiv.org/help/bulk_data_s3.html. For 2,686,172 fetched datasets with a data volume of just under 10 terabytes, the S3 transfer came to about 900 Euros.
fosco (Mar 15 2026 at 06:11):What copyright model is the most appropriate/safest, given the situation? Changing the one of my papers, if needed and possible, is a half an hour job...
John Baez (Mar 15 2026 at 06:28):If you have signed copyright permissions forms when publishing papers in journals, they may own the copyright to your papers now. If you own the copyright, you can choose any of the Creative Commons (CC) copyrights, and this will allow other entities to put your papers into other archives.
Of these various choices, the arXiv says "Many publishers allow accepted manuscripts to be deposited with a CC BY-NC-ND license", so maybe that's the safest.
Kevin Carlson (Mar 16 2026 at 20:43):Graham Manuell said:
OpenAI is not something I would bring up when arguing that a CEO is answerable to the board...
Well, if the ArXiv hires Sam Altman, you can definitely color me concerned.
John Baez (Mar 16 2026 at 21:40):I think the main problem so far is that the arXiv has not done anything to reassure its users about what this new developments. They have a thing called the arXiv blog, where they make announcements - that's where they announced the new requirement to write in English, for example. But they haven't said anything about trying to hire a CEO! They wrote about hiring a new engineering director.
Graham Manuell (Mar 20 2026 at 08:19):There's now a statement on the Cornell website, though the reasons given for the split are very incredibly vague. This article claims it's mainly in the hopes of getting more funding.