You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
From his papers, Bart Jacobs seems fairly convinced that data monads, especially the multiset monad and it's probability monad, the distribution monad, should play a role in physics. I would like to know if anyone here is also looking into this or has seen other similar work.
Not an answer (no mention of physics), but there is a small conversation about these 2 monads at #practice: applied ct > histogram monad
Nice, thanks
How does Bart Jacobs think these monads should play a role in physics?
The multiset monad is closely connected to the "Fock space" endofunctor on Hilb, which we use to describe collections of identical particles (bosons).
I talk about that here (keeping monads deep in the shadows):
The Fock space functor K is like a lift of the multiset monad from Set to Hilb along the functor I call F: Set Hilb.
The kleisli category of the finite (I think) multiset monad over a semiring is equivalent to matrices over that semiring, so what Bart cares about is the kleisli category of the -multiset monad which is pretty much just .
What's a "-multiset"? The set of finite complex linear combinations of elements of some set? That's usually called the free vector space on a set. It naturally gets completed to form a Hilbert space.
I was talking about actual multisets in my comment about second quantization.
Yeah, that's what his paper is about, which isn't as exciting as you might hope.
I believe he sees multisets as the middle part of this view of science:
Apparatus-> data monads-> probabilities
He calls the natural transformation from data monads to probabilities "learning".
John Baez said:
The multiset monad is closely connected to the "Fock space" endofunctor on Hilb, which we use to describe collections of identical particles (bosons).
I might be misremembering, but was there a sublety here in that "Hilb" should mean "Hilbert spaces and contractive/non-expansive maps" rather than "Hilbert spaces and bounded maps" for the Fock space construction to result in a well-defined endofunctor?
And I guess the functor should have sets and partial injections rather than Set as its domain - for instance, the unique map doesn't seem to induce a bounded map .
That's what Chris Heunen does in 'On The Functor '.
And Barr earlier in "algebraically compact functors", except that the codomain is Hilbert spaces and contractive maps.
Not sure whether the multiset monad survives the move to PInj though.