Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: community: general

Topic: License for Hodge Theory Repository Translation?


view this post on Zulip Jacob Zelko (Jul 30 2024 at 17:47):

Hi @Tim Hosgood,

I was trying to acknowledge code you wrote here: https://github.com/thosgood/hodge-theory for the translation work you have been doing on Hodge Theory and the accompanying forest you have been building. What is the license for the repository? Is it an MIT license? Thanks!

view this post on Zulip Tim Hosgood (Jul 30 2024 at 19:21):

at the moment there's no licence for it because I'm in the process of contacting Deligne to see if he's happy for me to actually make this publicly available! (also I'm bad at remembering to think about licences in general)

view this post on Zulip David Michael Roberts (Jul 30 2024 at 23:34):

@Jacob Zelko was it for the codebase itself or the translation? I presume the former, but @Tim Hosgood sounds like he is talking about the latter (which wouldn't be using an MIT license in any case).

view this post on Zulip Jacob Zelko (Jul 31 2024 at 00:01):

Hey @David Michael Roberts and @Tim Hosgood ! I was talking about the codebase itself (i.e.the forester repository code). Apologies if that wasn't so clear!

view this post on Zulip Jacob Zelko (Jul 31 2024 at 00:01):

(Thanks for asking to clarify David)

view this post on Zulip Tim Hosgood (Jul 31 2024 at 00:25):

oh, i have no idea how licences should work to distinguish between the two actually :shrug: can the codebase itself have a licence distinct from that of the translation given that the codebase is essentially 99% just the translation and then 1% a few lines of forester macros?

view this post on Zulip Jacob Zelko (Jul 31 2024 at 00:27):

Yea, that's how I have mine set-up and how I've seen some other websites set-up: the code would be under something like an MIT License and then the webpage content (defined in a license but like the actual content words of a webpage or blog post) would be under something like a Creative Commons license (like CC0).

view this post on Zulip Jacob Zelko (Jul 31 2024 at 00:27):

But, just for the record, I am not a lawyer so my words here should be taken with more than a grain of salt. This is only what I have seen.

view this post on Zulip Tim Hosgood (Jul 31 2024 at 00:29):

what's the default status if it's just up on github with no licence there at all? i'm guessing that nobody has any rights to reproduce or copy or whatever?

view this post on Zulip David Michael Roberts (Jul 31 2024 at 00:30):

Well, before anyone goes putting a translation of Deligne's work under a public domain license, the issue with getting his approval needs sorting out. I would certainly recommend Creative Commons licensing, but CC0 is a drastic step (one I take for my own research work, but this is different).

view this post on Zulip David Michael Roberts (Jul 31 2024 at 00:31):

I'm not sure about default licensing, but this tells me https://opensource.stackexchange.com/a/1721 that it is essentially all rights reserved by default

view this post on Zulip David Michael Roberts (Jul 31 2024 at 00:32):

Oh, here's the official word from GitHub: https://choosealicense.com/no-permission/

view this post on Zulip Jacob Zelko (Jul 31 2024 at 00:33):

Yup, as you pointed out @David Michael Roberts , that's generally the default with code on open source software from what I have seen. All rights tend to be reserved by the creator so no code should be lifted from a repository by someone else and credited as their own.

view this post on Zulip Jacob Zelko (Jul 31 2024 at 00:33):

Ah -- that's handy David. Never saw that statement from GitHub.

view this post on Zulip Tim Hosgood (Jul 31 2024 at 00:36):

honestly i worry that one day i will run afoul of licensing issues and have to just take down my translations. when i started it was just sharing rough versions of translations of lecture notes from the 50s/60s, but now i have a reasonably sized collection of papers up online and, realistically, if one of the ~15 different journals/publishers contacted me asking me to take them down then i would just do so

view this post on Zulip Tim Hosgood (Jul 31 2024 at 00:36):

i guess i should put the brakes on the whole thing and not continue until i've contacted every single journal for each article and asked them about copyright retention

view this post on Zulip Tim Hosgood (Jul 31 2024 at 00:37):

it's just frustrating because i translate these things for myself and have them just sitting on my computer

view this post on Zulip Ryan Wisnesky (Jul 31 2024 at 01:04):

French/eu copyright is 70 years, so some of those 50s papers might be fair game.

view this post on Zulip Kevin Carlson (Jul 31 2024 at 01:13):

I would tend to guess that the chance of anybody noticing this and complaining is infinitesimal.

view this post on Zulip Tim Hosgood (Jul 31 2024 at 01:41):

Ryan Wisnesky said:

French/eu copyright is 70 years, so some of those 50s papers might be fair game.

after the death of the author, no?

view this post on Zulip Tim Hosgood (Jul 31 2024 at 01:42):

Kevin Carlson said:

I would tend to guess that the chance of anybody noticing this and complaining is infinitesimal.

yeah true, it would just be nice for it to be zero and for everybody to be completely happy with it

view this post on Zulip Ryan Wisnesky (Jul 31 2024 at 15:21):

oh, right, after the death of the author. nvm