Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: community: general

Topic: Kock on symmetries


view this post on Zulip John Baez (Nov 08 2020 at 22:13):

Joachim Kock writes:

Problems with symmetries often arise from dividing out by them. You can kill symmetries by dividing out by them, but their ghosts will haunt you forever.

:ghost:

How true!

view this post on Zulip Matteo Capucci (he/him) (Nov 10 2020 at 13:46):

Those ghosts literally live in a higher dimension

view this post on Zulip John Baez (Nov 10 2020 at 15:30):

I like that!

In physics people deal with gauge symmetries by adding extra particles called "ghosts", but these then spawn "ghosts-on-ghosts", and so on - secretly morphisms in an \infty-groupoid.

view this post on Zulip Cole Comfort (Nov 10 2020 at 15:34):

How spooky. Like you can only see ghosts through the shadows which they leave, projected onto the wall or something...

view this post on Zulip Matteo Capucci (he/him) (Nov 10 2020 at 15:44):

John Baez said:

I like that!

In physics people deal with gauge symmetries by adding extra particles called "ghosts", but these then spawn "ghosts-on-ghosts", and so on - secretly morphisms in an \infty-groupoid.

Is this true or just speculative? Are those ghosts really morphisms in a higher groupid? :surprise:

view this post on Zulip John Baez (Nov 10 2020 at 15:45):

Something is true; I'm not giving a very precise account of it.

view this post on Zulip John Baez (Nov 10 2020 at 15:46):

But yes, there's a known relation between higher groupoids and the use of ghosts, ghosts-on-ghosts etc. in BRST quantization.

view this post on Zulip Matteo Capucci (he/him) (Nov 10 2020 at 15:47):

Very cool

view this post on Zulip John Baez (Nov 10 2020 at 15:47):

The nLab says it more precisely:

In physics and specifically in field theory, the BV-BRST formalism is a tool in homological algebra, higher differential geometry and derived geometry to handle the intersection- and quotient-constructions that appear

in the construction of reduced phase spaces of Lagrangian field theories, in particular including gauge theories; (“Lagrangian BV”)

in symplectic reduction of phase spaces (“Hamiltonian BV”)

In either case the BRST-BV complex is a model in dg-geometry of a joint homotopy intersection and homotopy quotient, hence of an (∞,1)-colimit and (∞,1)-limit, of a space in higher differential geometry/derived geometry.

Accordingly, the BRST-BV complex is built from two main pieces:

it contains in positive degree a BRST-complex: the Chevalley-Eilenberg algebra of the ∞-Lie algebroid which is the homotopy quotient (action Lie algebroid) of the gauge group (in Lagrangian BV) or of the group of flows generated by the constraints (in Hamiltonian BFV) – which is in general an ∞-group in either case – acting on configuration space CC;

it contains in negative degree a Koszul-Tate resolution of the critical locus of the action functional (for Lagrangian BV) or of the constraint surface (in Hamiltonian BFV).

view this post on Zulip John Baez (Nov 10 2020 at 15:49):

I was alluding to the BRST stuff. That's where "ghosts" live.

Note a " ∞-Lie algebroid" is an infinitesimal, i.e. linearized, description of an ∞-groupoid.